Design of floors for vibration quiz

Please answer the following 10 multiple choice questions, then click 'submit' to check the result. The pass mark for a CPD certificate is 8 out of 10, and you may retake the quiz as many times as you wish, but the questions will vary! Please note that one, two, three or all of the possible answers presented for each question may be right, and to gain a mark for that question all correct answers must be identified.

Good luck

Design of floors for vibration

Why do we calculate the natural frequency of a floor system? (tick all that apply)

To avoid resonant behaviour of the floor plate
To ensure that any dynamic effects do not induce loads greater than the static loads for which the floor plate has been designed
To ensure that the system frequency is sufficiently greater than the forcing or walking pace frequency
To obtain a qualitative prediction of the serviceability performance of the floor plate

What is a reasonable frequency range caused by walking?

2 Hz to 3 Hz
1 Hz to 2 Hz
2.8 Hz to 3.2 Hz
1.8 Hz to 2.2 Hz

When assessing the frequency of a floor, which elements of the floor must the designer check?

The slab
The secondary beam
The primary beam
All of the above, both individually and collectively

The frequency of an element or system is inversely proportional to the square root of the deflection. On what loading is the deflection based in the UK?

Dead load + 30% of the imposed load
Dead load + 10% of the imposed load
Dead load only
Dead load + imposed load

Which statement below does NOT describe a characteristic of a low frequency floor?

Has a fundamental frequency greater than 3 Hz but less than 10Hz
Exhibits a near resonant response
Both steady state and transient response must be checked
Has a fundamental frequency greater than 10Hz

When assessing vibrations in a floor, appropriate acceptance criteria can be referenced from where (more than one may apply)?

BS 5950: Structural use of steelwork in building
BS 6472: Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings
SCI publication P354 “Design of Floors for Vibration: a New Approach”
BS 6399: Loadings for buildings

The response factor of a floor is:

The peak acceleration of the floor
The peak acceleration of the floor divided by the base value
The root mean square (rms) acceleration of the floor
The rms acceleration of the floor divided by the base value (0.005 for z-axis vibrations)

Which of the following statements are true?

The response factors or multiplying factors given in BS 6472 are “for a low probability of adverse comment”
Multiplying factors are for exposure to continuous vibration
Multiplying factors are for a 16 hour exposure period during the day
Multiplying factors are for an 8 hour exposure period during the night

Where is the magnitude of damping of most importance?

Floors with low frequency
Floors with low frequency
Resonant floors
Floors subject to group activities

An engineer has designed a floor plate to a response factor of 7. The floor comprises secondary beams at 3m centres acting compositely with a 140mm composite deck. The secondary beam has a frequency of 4.5Hz. The main contractor is having difficulty in getting materials into what is a congested site, and has asked if it would be acceptable to replace the composite deck with a lightweight timber joist floor. He submits calculations that demonstrate that the same beam acting non-compositely is perfectly adequate in terms of strength, and achieves the same frequency of 4.5Hz due to a reduction in dead load of 75%. How should the engineer respond?

As long as the beam is satisfactory in terms of strength and the beam frequency remains the same or higher, then that proposal is perfectly acceptable.
Whilst your calculations demonstrate that the beam can support the change in loads, and that both the beam and system frequency are satisfactory, I have concerns about the vibration performance of the floor. The dead load of the floor construction has been reduced by 75%. Newton’s second law (acceleration = Force/Mass) suggests a four fold increase in the accelerations due to this significant reduction in dead load. The response factor has gone up from 7 to 28, which is well in excess of current practice.
No, the drawings clearly state the form of construction required.
Your proposal is acceptable provided you can offer a saving to the Client and accept design liability for your proposals.